tr.net ARTICLES AND PHOTOS AVAILABLE FOR PURCHASE
Click here for more information.











Links above in yellow for tr.net members only.

www.tennisone.com

www.foxsports.com/tennis

TVMatchpoint.com

KRC Communications

 

THE SCOOP: U.S. OPEN, DAY 10

Go back to 16 seeds

By Sandra Harwitt
tennisreporters.net

FLUSHING MEADOWS, N.Y., SEPT. 6

Let’s revisit the new fangled idea at the Grand Slams of seeding 32 players instead of 16. Did it do the job it was intended to do, saving the top players from being upset in the first couple of rounds? Absolutely.

Is that a good thing for the game? Absolutely not.

tennisreporters.net sticks by its original assessment on seeding 32 when it was first announced after Roland Garros. Basically, we don’t support the decision because as we predicted, nothing interesting happened in the first week of play. We weren’t the only people to notice that the 32-seed concept makes the first few rounds at a Grand Slam dull as dishwater. Many people were commenting on the lack of compelling matches at the Open throughout the first week.

It wasn’t until the third round that some of the names started to get tested in matches and a few fell by the wayside – Wimbledon champion Goran Ivanisevic surprisingly stepped out in the third round to Albert Costa and No. 9 seed Tim Henman landed on the wrong side of a five-setter to Xavier Malisse of Belgium.

The women’s draw provided little interest by holding to form well after the third-round. Only Martina Hingis was seen struggling in a fourth-round match that ended in a third-set tiebreaker to former French Open champion Iva Majoli of Croatia.

Yes, the French Open lost Venus Williams in the first round when she was upset by Barbara Schett of Austria in straight sets. That loss seemed to be part of the decision to seed 32 players at the Grand Slams. tennisreporters.net wasn’t bothered that Williams fell in that match because she was unprepared to play and deserved to be sent packing. While it meant that Williams was out of the draw, it added some excitement to the first round and there were plenty of other players left to fill the gap.

Just because you have marquee names hanging around for a long time doesn’t mean that it spices up a tournament. What happened at this U.S. Open is it made for a week of snooze before some lively matches took place – our choice for the best two matches here were the nearly perfect four-set quarterfinal match where Pete Sampras beat Andre Agassi in four tiebreaker sets and world No. 1 Gustavo Kuerten’s five-set thriller in the third round where he came back from two sets down to beat Max Mirnyi.

Here’s our advice to the Grand Slam Committee – go back to seeding only 16 players and let the party begin.

home | commentary | the scoop | newsletters | q&a | features
feedback | reporters | contact us | © 2002 tennisreporters.net

tennisreporters.net encourages e-mail comments on our stories.
Any e-mail sent to feedback@tennisreporters.net will be considered for
posting in our feedback section. Please include your full name and hometown/state/country.
tennisreporters.net
reserves the right to edit all feedback for content and length
.