|
WARMING UP FOR WIMBLEDON
Roddick and Roger revive with wins
on grass
Kids' play: Sharapova vs. Golovin
By Matthew Cronin
tennisreporters.net

Fred Mullane/Camerawork USA |
| Roddick and Federer
win in Britain and head to Wimbledon with confidence. |
It didn't take Roger Federer
and Andy Roddick much time to recover from their Roland Garros
meltdowns as both won grass court titles on Sunday: Federer with
a gaffe-like hooking of Mardy Fish in the Halle final and Roddick
with a straight-set thumping of Seb Grosjean at Queens.
And let's not forget Maria Sharapova,
who after being schooled at RG by Paola Suarez in the quarters,
marched to head of the class by trumping Tatiana Golovin 4-6,
6-2, 6-1 in Birmingham.
Roddick successful title defense with his
7-6(4), 6-4 win over Grosjean must have made his coach, Brad Gilbert,
very happy. Just before Roddick left Roland Garros, an angry Gilbert
said, "The key thing is to worry about Andy and not about
anyone else." he said. "He's going through a bit of
a bad patch right now and needs to focus on himself. This match
isn't coming back. As bad as today was, we have to think about
tomorrow."
Here's a toast to thinking ahead.
Recall that before Queens, Roddick hadn't won a tournament since
the NASDAQ in March. But in England, he was able to re-install
his version of Powerball 2004, twice producing world record serves
of 153 mph – first against Paradorn Srichaphan in the quarters
and again against three-time winner Lleyton Hewitt in the semis.
The win over Hewitt was gigantic,
as it was the first time he had ever beaten the hard-nosed Aussie
in four meetings.
"My big concern coming into
the tournament was getting some matches on grass," Roddick
said. "But with getting some wins over some Top-10 players
in the process, I couldn't ask for any more. I'm feeling good
right now. I'm hitting my second serve really big. I'm not sure
I've ever served this well before and I've got a lot of confidence
with it. I'm not second guessing on it."
Of course, Roddick still has to convince himself that he can beat
Federer at the AELTC. Roddick ended last year as No. 1, but in
some people's eyes, was a paper tiger. Even though he reached
the Aussie Open and Wimbledon semis and won the Open, he only
nabbed titles on grass (Queens) and hardcourts while second-ranked
Federer won titles on all surfaces.
ROGER
IS 6-1 OVER ANDY
Wimbledon champ Federer also beat him handily him at the
All England Club and at the Tennis Masters Cup in Houston en route
to the title. As a result, at year-end, the International Tennis
Writers Association voted Federer as its player of the year over
him. Much of that had to do with Federer's 6-1 record against
the American. Federer's heavenly run to the '04 Australian Open
title hasn't helped Roddick cause much either.
"Obviously, he's gotten the better of me so far," Roddick
said in the spring. "I feel like the first three times we
played it was earlier on in both of our careers and he was just
much better at that point, plain and simple. I didn't have nearly
the amount of polish on my game that he had, but the last two
times I have lost to him have been first set tiebreakers and that's
crucial. Whereas normally I can find a way to win those, he's
gotten the better of me in those. He's a great frontrunner. Once
you get down to him you don't see him all of a sudden take his
foot off the gas. He's definitely established himself as the best
player in the world. There's not a whole lot of doubt about that.
He's just lifted his game to another level. He's playing great
ball."
If Roddick is to pull to win Wimbledon, he might have to go through
Federer in the final. The Swiss is a brilliant all-courter who
has been able to transition into a serve-and-volleyer on grass.
As the world saw in their Wimbledon semifinal last year, Federer
is much more comfortable coming up to the cords than Roddick is.
The Floridian says that the inventive Federer "inspires"
him to take his game to new heights. Roddick's success is based
on three primary elements: His gigantic first and second serves,
his blowtorch forehand and his fiery competitiveness. The rest
of his game is still a work in progress. However, there's no question
that under coach Gilbert (who has now been with him for a year),
he's improved in other areas. He's taking bigger risks off his
foe's second serves, has further confidence in his backhand down
the line, and a willingness to go to net. He is by no means a
great volleyer, but is an efficient one. Nor is he the fastest
man out there, but he moves well for his size. Roddick knows that
if he is to win Wimbledon, his transition game needs to run as
efficiently as the high-speed Paris to London Eurostar train.
"We've been trying to work on the transition game a little
more, maybe give people a different look than maybe what they
would normally see," Roddick said. "It's continuing
the process of trying to improve. The more you do something, the
more natural it feels. I know I can volley a little. I'm not a
good volleyer by any means, but I can do it. Especially after
a big serve, I should be able to have that option."
Fred Mullane/Camerawork USA |
| Fish was pleased with finals appearance
in Halle. |
Grosjean has noticed Andy's improvement,
saying, "Roddick's the best server on the tour. He also goes
to the net more than he used to, and he's a little more aggressive
on his second serve. He can go flat, he can go wide. But he doesn't
only count on his serve."
FISH IS MINCEMENT in straight-set loss
Federer also repeated, filleting
Fish 6-0, 6-3 in 57 minutes. It was Federer's fifth crown of the
season (Australian Open, Dubai, Pacific Life Open and Masters Series
Hamburg). The 22-year-old, who didn't lose a set on his way to the
title, extended his winning streak on grass to 17 matches. En route
to the title, he beat a very decent group that included Thomas Johansson,
Mikhail Youzhny, Arnaud Clement and Jiri Novak. "Playing here
was the best preparation for Wimbledon," said Federer. "Now,
I will have some time off to relax and enjoy my victory and then
I'll arrive early and start focusing on Wimbledon."
It was quite a week for Fish, who had been out of action since
mid-April due to hip injury and who underwent criticism in the
spring for his poor work ethic. The 22-year-old American jumped
up to No. 18 in the rankings, but must be somewhat shook up by
the result.
"I'm a bit disappointed about
today's result," he said."Losing 6-0 in the first set
is not what you want in a final. I don't want to say I was nervous
and I couldn't play. Nervousness wasn't the reason, I'd rather
say that it was a combination of Roger's plays, especially returning
my serves, and me maybe not playing so well. … [But] I have
to say it was definitely a fine week for me. I love playing on
grass, it is definitely my favorite surface." Fish will play
Nottingham this week.
Since his win at Roland Garros,
Gaston Gaudio has been busy in Buenos Aires, where put in some
40 media appearances and is scheduled to meet Argentine president
D. Nestor Carlos Kirchner. During whirlwind schedule, he found
time to pull put of Wimbledon with a minor injury. Inexcusable.
If I was a member of the Wimbledon seeding committee, here's my
top five guys:
1. Federer
2. Roddick
3. Tim Henman
4. David Nalbandian
5. Guillermo Coria
Kids' play: Sharapova vs. Golovin

WTA Tour |
| Tatiana Golovin |
In the youngest final since where
Jennifer Capriati (15 years, 4 months) defeated Monica Seles (17
years, 8 months) in San Diego in 1991, Maria Sharapova out-hit
the tremendous hitter Tatiana Golovin.
With a combined age of 33 years and 6 months, Sharapova (17 years,
1 month) and Golovin (16 years, 4 months) were the third youngest
finalists in the Open era. (Andrea Jaeger and Tracy Austin in
Tampa were the other one.)
Which begs the question, is this a sign that either Sharapova
or Golovin has a Hall-of-Fame career ahead of her?
Sharapova has improved a ton during the past year and already
owns three titles, but she's still not taking down the elite players
and could be a year away from doing so. At No. 15, her ranking
has jumped 100 spots over last year, which is remarkable, but
look who she beat to win Birmingham: Jamea Jackson, Samantha Stosur,
Alicia Molik, Patty Schnyder and Golovin. Those are all matches
she should be winning.
However, give how depleted the Wimbledon field is, do not completely
count her out. The only players in the field she doesn't appears
to be capable of defeating are Venus and Serena Williams and Amelie
Mauresmo. Plus, one never knows whether their collective health
will allow them to finish the tournament.
"This is the best possible
preparation for Wimbledon, the best you can get," said Sharapova,
who also won the dubs with Maria Kirilenko. "I've had some
tough wins here and winning a title always gives you the confidence
to think that you can win more. I always believe I can win the
title when I enter an event."
France's Golovin cracked the Top 50 for the first time and will
be heard from for a long time to come. She's still too erratic
to make major waves at a major in singles – she did win
the Roland Garros mixed with Richard Gasquet – but a second
week appearance at Wimbledon can't be dismissed. She has a class
"A" backhand and a whole lot of attitude.
"Maria was just too good today, but I'm sure I'll get revenge
next time," she said.
If I was a member of the Wimbledon seeding committee, here's my
top five gals:
1. Serena
2. Venus
3. Mauresmo
4. Anastasia Myskina
5. Lindsay Davenport
|